Artificial IntelligenceRegulations

Prohibited AI practices

Uses of AI that are banned outright rather than merely regulated.

A small set of AI uses are treated as unacceptable and banned, not conditioned on safeguards. The clearest example is the EU AI Act, whose Article 5 prohibits social scoring by public authorities, untargeted scraping of facial images, most real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces, emotion recognition in workplaces and schools, and certain manipulative or exploitative systems. A December 2026 amendment adds a ban on AI that generates non-consensual intimate imagery and child sexual abuse material. Other jurisdictions ban narrower categories, usually deepfakes of a person's likeness without consent and AI-generated sexual abuse material.

Why it matters

Prohibitions carry the heaviest penalties and apply regardless of sector or company size. They are the first thing to check because no amount of documentation or disclosure makes a banned use lawful.

How each jurisdiction handles it

Recent developments

July 9, 2026
European Commission

Digital Omnibus receives final green light, locking in high-risk delay

The AI Act simplification package cleared its final approval. It confirms the deferral of stand-alone high-risk obligations to December 2, 2027 and product-embedded ones to August 2, 2028, narrows the 'safety component' test, and adds the nudifier and CSAM prohibition taking effect in December 2026.

May 7, 2026
Latham & Watkins

EU institutions agree the AI Act Omnibus, extending deadlines and adding prohibitions

Negotiators reached political agreement on the first amendments to the AI Act since adoption. The package extends high-risk deadlines, trims duplicative product rules, softens the AI-literacy duty, and introduces a ban on AI that generates non-consensual intimate imagery and CSAM.

January 2026
CMS

Peru's AI regulation enters into force with prohibitions and phased sector deadlines

The implementing regulation of Law 31814 took effect ninety business days after its September publication, adding a three-tier risk framework, prohibitions on unauthorized mass surveillance and predictive policing, human-oversight duties, sandboxes, and sector compliance clocks running one to four years.

Common questions

What does prohibited ai practices mean in AI regulation?
A small set of AI uses are treated as unacceptable and banned, not conditioned on safeguards. The clearest example is the EU AI Act, whose Article 5 prohibits social scoring by public authorities, untargeted scraping of facial images, most real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces, emotion recognition in workplaces and schools, and certain manipulative or exploitative systems. A December 2026 amendment adds a ban on AI that generates non-consensual intimate imagery and child sexual abuse material. Other jurisdictions ban narrower categories, usually deepfakes of a person's likeness without consent and AI-generated sexual abuse material.
Why does prohibited ai practices matter for compliance?
Prohibitions carry the heaviest penalties and apply regardless of sector or company size. They are the first thing to check because no amount of documentation or disclosure makes a banned use lawful.
Cite this page

Artificial Intelligence Regulations, "Prohibited AI practices in AI Regulation," reviewed July 28, 2026, https://artificialintelligenceregulations.com/topics/prohibited-practices.html.

Entries state the position as of the review date and link to the primary text for verification.